Sucralose vs. Stevia: Which Sweetener Is Better for Muscle Growth?
- Liam
- Mar 5
- 8 min read

Table of Contents
Summary
Sucralose and stevia are two of the most popular sugar substitutes used in protein powders, pre-workouts, and fitness supplements. But which one is better for muscle growth? While both are zero-calorie sweeteners, they differ in how they interact with insulin response, gut health, and nutrient absorption—all of which play a role in muscle recovery and protein synthesis.
Some athletes worry that sucralose may negatively impact gut bacteria or cause a mild insulin response, while others claim that stevia has anti-inflammatory benefits that could support recovery. But is there enough scientific evidence to suggest that one is better than the other for building muscle?
In this article, we’ll compare sucralose vs. stevia in terms of muscle protein synthesis, insulin regulation, gut health, and hydration, so you can determine which sweetener best supports your training goals.
What Are Sucralose and Stevia?

Sucralose and stevia are two commonly used sugar substitutes, each with distinct origins and metabolic effects. While both are zero-calorie sweeteners, they are processed differently by the body, which may influence their impact on muscle growth, digestion, and recovery.
What Is Sucralose?
A synthetic sweetener made from sucrose through a chemical modification process.
600 times sweeter than sugar, commonly used in protein powders, pre-workouts, and sports drinks.
Non-caloric and non-metabolized, meaning the body does not break it down for energy.
FDA-approved and widely used in fitness products due to its high stability in heat and liquids.
What Is Stevia?
A natural sweetener extracted from the Stevia rebaudiana plant.
250-300 times sweeter than sugar, but with a slightly bitter aftertaste.
Contains steviol glycosides, compounds that do not cause an insulin spike and may have anti-inflammatory properties.
Some research suggests stevia could have prebiotic effects, potentially benefiting gut health.
Key Differences Between Sucralose and Stevia
While both sweeteners are widely used in fitness supplements, their effects on muscle recovery and performance remain a key area of debate. Next, we’ll analyze which sweetener has a greater impact on muscle protein synthesis (MPS).
Sucralose vs. Stevia: Which One Affects Muscle Protein Synthesis?

Muscle protein synthesis (MPS) is the biological process that repairs and rebuilds muscle fibers after exercise. To maximize muscle growth, athletes need optimal protein absorption, insulin function, and nutrient utilization. Some concerns have been raised over whether artificial and natural sweeteners interfere with MPS, but what does the research say?
Do Sucralose or Stevia Inhibit Protein Absorption?
Since neither sucralose nor stevia contains protein, they do not directly contribute to muscle protein synthesis. However, their potential effects on digestion and metabolic signaling could indirectly influence MPS efficiency.
1. Sucralose and Protein Absorption
A 2021 study in Frontiers in Physiology suggested that sucralose may alter gut bacteria composition in mice, potentially affecting protein digestion efficiency.
However, a 2020 study in The Journal of Nutrition found no significant effect on protein absorption or amino acid utilization from sucralose consumption in healthy individuals.
2. Stevia and Protein Absorption
Research in Nutrients (2021) suggested that stevia may support gut health, potentially enhancing nutrient absorption through prebiotic effects.
A 2020 study in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found no inhibitory effects of stevia on protein metabolism when consumed alongside a high-protein diet.
Do Sucralose or Stevia Impact the mTOR Pathway?
The mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) pathway is a key signaling mechanism that regulates muscle growth and MPS. Any ingredient that disrupts mTOR activation could potentially reduce muscle-building efficiency.
Sucralose does not inhibit mTOR
meaning it does not block muscle protein synthesis.
Stevia contains bioactive compounds
that some studies suggest may have anti-inflammatory effects, but there is no direct evidence that it boosts MPS.
Do Sucralose or Stevia Affect Insulin Levels?

Insulin plays a key role in muscle recovery and growth by promoting nutrient absorption and glycogen replenishment. Since insulin is an anabolic hormone, its regulation can influence muscle protein synthesis (MPS). Some athletes worry that artificial sweeteners like sucralose may increase insulin secretion, while others claim that stevia has insulin-regulating properties.
How Sucralose Affects Insulin Response
Research on sucralose and insulin levels has produced mixed findings:
1. Studies Showing a Mild Insulin Response
A 2013 study in Diabetes Care found that sucralose increased insulin levels by 20% in insulin-sensitive individuals, though it did not raise blood sugar.
A 2011 study in Physiology & Behavior suggested that chronic sucralose use could slightly alter insulin response, though this effect was not consistent across all individuals.
2. Studies Showing No Significant Effect
A 2020 meta-analysis in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found no substantial insulin response to sucralose in most individuals.
A 2021 study in The Journal of Nutrition concluded that sucralose had no significant impact on post-meal insulin secretion compared to water.
How Stevia Affects Insulin Response
Unlike sucralose, stevia has been studied for its potential insulin-regulating effects:
A 2004 study in Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental found that stevia may enhance insulin sensitivity, suggesting benefits for blood sugar regulation.
Another 2021 study in Nutrients suggested that stevia stimulates insulin release in a controlled manner, potentially supporting better glucose uptake in muscle cells.
Unlike sucralose, stevia does not appear to cause insulin resistance, making it a potential option for those with metabolic concerns.
Gut Health & Nutrient Absorption: Which Sweetener Supports Muscle Growth?

Gut health plays a crucial role in nutrient absorption, digestion, and overall metabolic efficiency—all of which impact muscle recovery and growth. Since artificial sweeteners interact with gut bacteria, some research suggests that sucralose and stevia may affect the microbiome differently, potentially influencing nutrient uptake and muscle recovery.
Does Sucralose Harm Gut Health?
Studies have investigated whether sucralose disrupts gut bacteria, with mixed results:
1. Studies Indicating a Negative Impact
A 2021 study in Frontiers in Physiology found that sucralose altered gut bacteria in mice, reducing beneficial strains linked to digestion.
Another study in The Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health (2020) reported that sucralose reduced lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, two bacterial strains essential for gut health.
2. Studies Showing No Significant Effect in Humans
A 2021 review in Nutrients concluded that moderate sucralose intake does not significantly impact gut microbiome health in humans.
A 2022 study in The Journal of Nutrition found no evidence that sucralose impairs nutrient absorption in athletes consuming a high-protein diet.
Does Stevia Support Gut Health?
Some research suggests that stevia may have prebiotic properties, meaning it could support gut bacteria and digestion:
A 2020 study in Microorganisms found that stevia promoted the growth of beneficial gut bacteria, potentially improving digestion and nutrient absorption.
Another study in Nutrients (2019) reported that stevia’s glycosides might reduce gut inflammation, which could support recovery in athletes.
However, some individuals experience mild bloating or digestive discomfort when consuming high amounts of stevia.
Sucralose vs. Stevia for Hydration and Recovery

Hydration plays a critical role in muscle recovery, as it supports nutrient transport, muscle contractions, and electrolyte balance. Since sucralose and stevia are commonly found in sports drinks, protein powders, and pre-workout supplements, athletes often wonder if these sweeteners impact fluid retention or hydration efficiency.
Do Sucralose and Stevia Affect Hydration?
Neither sucralose nor stevia directly causes dehydration, but some studies suggest they may alter thirst perception or digestion, indirectly influencing hydration.
1. Sucralose and Hydration
A 2016 study in The Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition found that sucralose-sweetened beverages hydrate just as effectively as water or sugar-sweetened drinks.
Some individuals report bloating or mild digestive distress from sucralose, which could affect hydration levels by altering fluid retention.
A 2019 study in Appetite found that sucralose may reduce thirst perception, leading some people to drink less fluid than needed.
2. Stevia and Hydration
A 2020 study in Nutrients concluded that stevia does not impair hydration or electrolyte balance when consumed in moderate amounts.
Some research suggests that stevia has diuretic properties, meaning it may increase urine output, which could affect fluid retention in high doses.
Unlike sucralose, stevia is less likely to cause bloating, making it a better option for those sensitive to digestion issues.
Electrolyte Balance and Recovery
Electrolytes (sodium, potassium, magnesium) are crucial for muscle contractions, fluid balance, and recovery.
Sucralose-sweetened electrolyte drinks are effective, but excessive use may cause digestive issues.
Stevia-sweetened electrolyte drinks support hydration, but if consumed in high amounts, its mild diuretic effect could lead to slightly increased fluid loss.
Who Should Be Cautious?
Endurance athletes should ensure they drink enough fluids, regardless of which sweetener is used.
Individuals prone to bloating or gut sensitivities should monitor their response to sucralose in particular.
Those who consume large amounts of stevia should be aware of its mild diuretic effect and adjust fluid intake accordingly.
Pros and Cons: Which Sweetener Is Better for Athletes?

Now that we’ve examined the effects of sucralose and stevia on muscle protein synthesis, insulin response, gut health, and hydration, let’s summarize their advantages and drawbacks to determine which is better suited for athletes and muscle growth.
Pros of Sucralose for Muscle Growth
Zero calories, making it ideal for cutting phases or those tracking macros.
Highly stable in heat and liquids, making it a popular choice in protein powders and pre-workouts.
Does not directly impact muscle protein synthesis (MPS) or inhibit nutrient absorption.
Minimal effect on insulin in most people, allowing it to be used in low-carb diets without major concerns.
Cons of Sucralose for Muscle Growth
Potential gut microbiome alterations, which may indirectly affect digestion and nutrient uptake.
Mild insulin response in some insulin-sensitive individuals, though not significant for most people.
Possible bloating or digestive discomfort, particularly in those with gut sensitivities.
Pros of Stevia for Muscle Growth
Naturally derived, making it a preferred choice for those avoiding artificial sweeteners.
Supports insulin sensitivity, potentially aiding nutrient uptake and glucose regulation.
May have prebiotic benefits, supporting gut health and enhancing digestion.
No significant impact on muscle protein synthesis or hydration balance.
Cons of Stevia for Muscle Growth
Slightly bitter aftertaste, which some individuals find unpleasant in protein supplements.
Possible mild diuretic effect, leading to increased urination and potential fluid loss if consumed in excess.
May cause mild bloating in sensitive individuals, though less commonly than sucralose.
Who Should Choose Sucralose?
Athletes who prefer sweeter flavors in supplements without a bitter aftertaste.
Individuals in a calorie deficit who need a non-caloric sweetener with minimal metabolic effects.
Those without gut sensitivities who do not experience digestive discomfort from sucralose.
Who Should Choose Stevia?
Individuals with insulin resistance or metabolic concerns, as stevia may support better glucose control.
Athletes who prioritize gut health, as stevia has potential prebiotic benefits.
Those avoiding artificial sweeteners due to personal or health reasons.
Final Verdict: Which Sweetener Should You Choose?

After reviewing the research on sucralose vs. stevia for muscle growth, it’s clear that neither sweetener directly enhances or inhibits muscle recovery, but they do have distinct metabolic effects that may influence individual preferences.
Sucralose Is Best For:
Athletes who prefer a sweeter taste in protein powders and supplements.
Individuals in a calorie-controlled diet who want a sugar substitute that does not alter blood sugar significantly.
Those without gut sensitivities, as sucralose may impact gut bacteria in some individuals.
Stevia Is Best For:
Athletes prioritizing gut health, as stevia may support beneficial gut bacteria.
Individuals concerned with insulin sensitivity, since stevia may help regulate glucose levels.
Those preferring natural alternatives, as stevia is a plant-based sweetener with potential anti-inflammatory benefits.
For most healthy athletes, both sucralose and stevia are viable sugar alternatives that do not significantly impact muscle protein synthesis, insulin function, or hydration. However, the choice between them depends on personal digestive tolerance, insulin sensitivity, and preference for artificial vs. natural ingredients.
Related Posts
Is Sucralose Bad for Muscle Growth? Effects & Research Explained
Does sucralose impact muscle protein synthesis, insulin response, and recovery? Find out what science says about its effects on muscle-building efficiency.
How Artificial Sweeteners Affect Muscle Recovery: What Science Says
Do artificial sweeteners slow muscle recovery? Learn how they influence inflammation, protein synthesis, and hydration post-workout.
Do Artificial Sweeteners Impact Nutrient Absorption? The Gut-Muscle Connection
Do artificial sweeteners affect digestion and nutrient absorption? Learn how they interact with gut bacteria, protein uptake, and overall muscle recovery.